> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Ford > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 5:45 PM > To: Gary R. Van Sickle > Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com > Subject: RE: Bespoke installations: simple elegance of > setup.exe when setup.ini is absent > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, 20:58:44 -0500 Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > As one of the many people responsible for setup... > > On Mon, 2 May 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > - I am responsible for a good portion of setup's UI. It > used to be a > > series of dialog boxes. It is now a "Wizard"-style UI. I did that. > > I believe it was simply the choice of the word responsible > that cgf objected to.
Unfortunately no, Brian. What Chris objected to was my taking him to task over an uncalled-for rude comment he made. His comments in this thread are, in his mind anyway, some sort of "retribution" for that. Yeah, I don't get it either. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
