----Original Message----
>From: Christopher Faylor
>Sent: 20 April 2005 16:37
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> ----Original Message----
>>> From: Christopher Faylor
>>> Sent: 20 April 2005 15:37
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 03:19:32PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> I was planning to look into that for my next patch, as it happens!
>>>
>>> So were *you* under the impression that you needed a cygwin copyright
>>> assignment to modify setup.exe? That's not the case, if so.
>>
>> Umm, no, I was (and still am) under the impression that I need a cygwin
>> assignment on file for contributions to the dll. I hadn't actually
>> considered what the case was for setup, although the phrase "As per
>> cygwin1.dll:" (apps/setup/README) was somewhat suggestive. The terms
>> for accepting contributions for both setup and newlib seem somewhat
>> under-documented, or at least I couldn't find them explicitly stated
>> anywhere.
>
> Well, I'm glad I could clear up your apparent misconception then.
>
> cgf
A doco patch would be even nicer :) and save you the time and trouble in
future, no doubt....
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
