On Apr 6 02:09, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > Corinna, have you a chance to think about this? I've come to think that > using the MinGW rules makes most sense.
I didn't think any further about this. It's not that important since it's easily workaroundable. I also fear we get the usual complaints that zillions of scripts must be changed if we dare to break backward compatibility here. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
