On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:13:55PM -0800, Jim Kleckner wrote: >My question now is, can "ln" be used to work around this issue or is >that a "bad idea"?
It's a bad idea. Just delete the spurious DLL. No special action is required if the cygwin dll is in the PATH. >PS. Since cgf is steadfast, perhaps this explanation could be added to >the FAQ entry located here that partially explains why multiple dlls is >a problem: http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC50 No. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
