On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:37:42PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mar 2 15:31, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Mar 2 13:33, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Hm. We probably need to put a finit instruction into the autoload code >>>somewhere. wsock_init () looks like just the place...... now if I >>>just persuade the CVS code to build without a SIG11 (grmbl grmbl....) >> >>Hmm? -v please. > >I just added an finit call to wsock_init and it seems to work fine. > >Are there any non-FPU CPUs >= i386 out there which would choke on this >machine instruction? I guess not, but I'm not exactly fluent in ix86 >history...
I mentioned to Corinna on irc that I don't think that just calling finit is the right way to handle this. What if someone had already set the precision as they liked? Then loading winsock would reset it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
