On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:08:04AM +0100, David Dindorp wrote: >Cristopher Faylor wrote:
"Christopher" >>Anyway, this sounds a lot like the bash problem which has been >>discussed here over the last several months (most heavily in the >>October time frame). If you aren't running bash-2.05b-17 then >>that's probably your problem. > >bash 3.0 is not good enough? If you are running your own version of bash, then all bets are off. I thought that bash-2.05b-17 was the current version but it is actually a test version designed to handle the problem that you are apparently describing. I'll follow up in cygwin-apps to see why this version is still in test. >I went through the archives for October (anything related to "bash"), >but couldn't find anything that seems related to me. Would you mind >pointing me in the right direction (subject, link, anything)? Sorry, no. I'm not going to do an archive search for you. Maybe someone else will accommodate you. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
