On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:28:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Feb 1 22:00, linda w wrote: >> Cool - does that mean it was a bug and was fixed, or did it just >> happen to disappear due to some other improvement? Either way... > >It was a bug which just didn't show up with ls from the old fileutils. > >> 'bout how long does it take till things go from CVS to a release, >> these days. > >Usually within the same year. > >> I've tried twice to build from CVS, but never seem >> to have gotten a full build to run w/no errors (not to mention having >> a woefully inadequate machine to build such a project on...(sigh)). > >Did you read http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html#SEC104 lately? Otherwise, >as Brian wrote, try a snapshot.
I thought that section was designed for punishment, not information. Corinna, you seem to forget that we make building cygwin very hard so that we are assured of job security. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
