On Jan 20 09:47, Adrian Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 10:06 -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > > > Gets kind of old to hear this "debated" over and over again when it's > > clear that the developers are not interested in the work involved. > > > > Time for a cygwin-multi-versions (moderated?) list? cygwin-licensing > > was very successful at reducing the licensing traffic (both here and > > there). > > It would be useful if there was a forum for people who distribute > cygwin1.dll along with an application. I'm not very interested in the > whole Cygwin distribution, and I'm going to end up maintaining an > in-house fork of the code to solve my problems. I doubt I'm the only one > doing this, and I'll happily take it to a more appropriate list.
But you're aware that you have to release the DLL and depending applications under the GPL, with all sources, aren't you? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/