On Jan 7 01:28, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > Right now I'm looking at the debian packages instead: > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortune-mod > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/fortunes-bofh-excuses > > which generate 5 packages: fortune-mod (the binaries), > fortunes-min, fortunes, fortunes-off, and fortunes-bofh-excuses. > > If these look ok to me, do you see any problem with using them instead? > (There are also a lot of non-English data files packages that I'm not > going to mess with at the moment.)
Personally I'd rather see only one fortune package. Using the -o plus rot13 technique should really do it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
