On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> So, what are you expecting then? If this isn't going to work for you
> and modifying your makefiles isn't a going to be a solution in any
> event, it's difficult to see what you are hoping for. A magic
> environment variable maybe? If so, unfortunately one does not exist.
gcc was coded or configured to add the .exe extension automatically even
though the -o output filename doesn't have it.
I am just asking: where was gcc patched/coded or configured to add this
.exe extension?
Jeremy C. Reed
BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links
http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
