On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:59:46PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote: > Could this be related to PR 17220?
I wouldn't think so. My patch *should* only have any affect when stdcall functions are involved. (Well, that's not quite true -- the output may be a bit more compact, since I reduced the number of DW_CFA_GNU_args_size bits emitted, but the same information should be present.) r~ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
