----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cygwin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 5:09 PM Subject: Re: pax available?
> At 04:34 PM 11/19/2004, you wrote: > >What does any of this have to do with pax? The FAQ doesn't mention anything > >about pax or archiving in general? > > > Again: > > "What packages should I download? Where are 'make', 'gcc', 'vi', etc?" > > Missed the point? OK, let's break it down: > > "What packages should I download?" > > You asked in what package was "pax". See any similarities? No > OK, hopefully > something correlates for you here now. Let's move on: > > "Where are 'make', 'gcc', 'vi', etc?" Again, what does this have to do with pax? So far you've answered every question except the one I asked. Is there some point to all this? > > "etc" is the operative term here. You can substitute "pax". Does the FAQ > entry make sense to you now? No. As previously stated, the FAQ mentions nothing about pax. Thankfully there are some on this list server who are more interested in giving straight answers than simply trying to argue. Perhaps *you* should read the FAQ and tell us all where pax is mentioned at all. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
