On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 02:31:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 07:19:17PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote:
>>so cgf should repackage it. it's obviously a bug.
>
> From the description of the behavior of the released flex binary, it sounds
>like it is working just fine.
>
>If you are saying that I should repackage the source files because you
>couldn't that the package was linked with automode.o then, that's
^
see
>something which is very far down on my list of priorities.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
