Dalibor wrote:
[...]
Yes I see, maybe I was confused by your words: "... and published under a BSD license without an advertising clause."
Sorry about that, that's just a general way of me saying 'GPL-compatible BSD-ish code'. Kaffe being GPL means that we can't mix it with four clause BSD licensed code with the advertising clause.
I'll check in a note on the copyright details of inet_*.c files into kaffe's CVS THRIDPARTY file right away. Thanks for bringing it up!
cheers, dalibor topic
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
