Christopher Faylor wrote: > Grr... This was the newlib problem previously mentioned. I forgot to > generate the snapshot in such a way as to work around this problem. > > The new snapshot should work better.
Indeed it does. I have tried a couple of times without any hickups. With 1.5.11 a have not been able to get my testcase to even pass once if straceing. With this snapshot I now have 5 consecutive successes (and no failures). I'm afraid I don't understand the issue and why the temporary change in the snapshot points at bash, so someone else is probably better suited to notify the bash maintainer. (If the evidence in this message qualifies as confirmation.) BTW, thanks for helping out with debugging! Cheers, Peter -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/