On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 08:11:39AM +0200, Peter Ekberg wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I was thinking the same thing but AFAIK, ash doesn't have the pid >>recycling problem. > >Don't know where ash comes into play, the script is executed by bash. >I must have missed some other test case...
Remember this? >On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:05:01AM -0400, Bogdan Vacaliuc wrote: >>4) http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00449.html >> thru http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg00556.html >> >>This relates to Manfred Spraul's patch for bash related to RECYCLES_PIDS. I >>have observed the failure to occur under (a)sh, and bash 2.04.5, 2.05b and **** >>3.00.0 ( I compiled them all, including enabling the RECYCLES_PIDS for bash >>2.05b ). cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
