Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > Is this true? I have 3.3.1 libraries in /lib and > > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1, but 2.95 libraries only in > > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. > > There was no libjava with 2.x compilers. There was no libobjc with 2.x > compilers. What about libstdc++?
As I said, 2.95 holds all its libraries, including libstdc++, in /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10. > > When 3.4 becomes default and > > official, could you release a 3.3 build with libraries moved completely to > > /lib/gcc-lib ? > > Hmmm, I don't like maintaining two versions of a package, if 3.4 is > stable it will be the one and only current version. I'm aware of it and that's why I'm asking. That would be the final release of 3.3, able to coexist with 3.4. Then you could happily forget about 3.3. This would make no sense if 3.4 is binary compatible with 3.3. Are differences between 3.3 and 3.4 significant? Regards Krzysztof Duleba -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
