> GARY VANSICKLE wrote: >> There's three reasons people knee-jerk against HTML email: >> >> 1. It isn't ASCII (i.e. the "Back in my day a child would open up a >> gift and within seconds he'd either burst into flames or lose a limb! >> That's the way it was and we liked it!"[1] Defense). >> 2a. There isn't an email program alive which can do a "Reply" to an >> HTML email properly. > I'm using one right now... > > Mozilla (Thunderbird) handles replying to HTML email just fine. >
Yep, it does the best job last I checked. >> 2b. ...especially those which support VT-100 terminals. >> 3. The lines are longer than 80 characters ;-). >> >> I fall under category 2a, but my knee isn't jerking: If Outlook >> didn't absolutely s*ck *ss at "editing" HTML I wouldn't care. > You can't blame everything on your choice to use Outlook. I don't blame anything on my choice to use Outlook. -- Gary R. Van Sickle -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
