Try reversing this patch:Patched gcc 3.4 + patched cygwin1.dll = success. Thanks a lot.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config/i386/cygming.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
So, i have to ask 2 annoying questions:
a) is Brian Ford patch to threadfunc_fe gonna make it to the official cygwin at some point in one form or another?
b) what can be done about the gcc/binutil thing? Should i raise the issue with the binutils and/or gcc ppl or just sit on it?
PS: Excuse my ignorance, but is there a way to keep a local copy of cygwin1.dll without getting caught by the cygwin-system-consistency police?
--
Regards,
tbp.
-- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
