On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Joe Buehler wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > I've been advocating just releasing the current snapshot as is, although
> > it would also be nice to fix the pcre0 dependency problem.
>
> How about putting up a version of the current setup that has been modified
> with ResHacker to use larger panels? I suppose there could be two versions,
> for those who have small displays. This is what I personally use for Cygwin
> setup.
This was the initial proposal, before resizability was implemented. IMO,
resizable setup is better, if you're careful (i.e., don't resize the
panels to be smaller than the standard size; in fact, only use "Maximize"
on the chooser screen, and "Restore" back to the original size for
others).
> I presume it would be fairly easy to just recompile from source and change
> the panel sizes that way also. Though that may not be a good thing to
> assume...
Sure, but pretty much everything in the dialogs will need to be changed --
not just the size, but also the positions of each widget. Not impossible,
but tedious, and pretty useless with general resizability available.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
