Quite interesting indeed! Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x (cygwin), etc against the gcc2.9x vintage?
H. "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > ======================================== > > Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers > > C/C++ Performance Tests > > ========================================= > > > > > > > <snip> > > While this is quite interesting, it seems to me you aren't really > running these programs for long enough for us to be able to see what > differences are due to startup time and due to runtime. How about a > couple of extra jobs, one of which runs for 1 minute and one for 2? > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
