On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:32:16AM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Hans Horn wrote: > >> this was something I did try out as well. However, the dll produced with >> "-no-cygwin" was just as "bad" as before. >> Then I recalled faintly reading some discussion a while back, that >> "mingw-gcc != gcc -no-cygwin" (don't remember details, though). > >-no-cygwin ? I thought it was -mno-cygwin. Or are both the same >thing ?
The correct switch is -mno-cygwin. -mno-cygwin should be equivalent to building with the mingw compiler unless you try to include cygwin header files or libraries, which is a common mistake. -- Christopher Faylor spammer? -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cygwin Co-Project Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED] TimeSys, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
