On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:18:58PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 07:10:25AM -0700, "E. Weddington" wrote:
> >> On 26 Mar 2004 at 9:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mar 25 15:17, E. Weddington wrote:
> >> > > Just wondering, is there a tentative release schedule for cygwin 1.5.10? Say,
> >> > > sometime within the next week?
> >> >
> >> > It's scheduled for 2004.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I was beginning to wonder if it was going to be dragged out to 2005, 2006, or
> >> whatever. Since
> >> others were reporting such fine grained control of installing Cygwin, such as
> >> "gee, look, I can
> >> install 1.5.9 with bugs, OR go back to 1.5.5", now I'm thinking that I really
> >> don't need to wait for
> >> 1.5.10.....
> >>
> >> Thanks ;-)
> >
> >WADR to CGF's hard work, I can tell you even before it is released that
> >1.5.10 has bugs. So do 1.5.11, 1.5.12, etc. With a software project of
> >sufficient size, it's a given. The question is, do the bugs bite *you*?
> >Have you tried 1.5.9? If you had problems with it, have you tried a
> >snapshot to see if those problems are resolved?
>
> How dare you imply that cygwin has bugs?
>
> I'm sending this email from cygwin right now and I
Now that's why we have all those acronyms[*] for Cygwin -- so that you can
type the e-mail quickly and send it off before hitting one of those...
Igor
[*] <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/> for the uninitiated.
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
