On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:38:01PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:33:52PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I think I may have figured this out. >> >>It wasn't the eax register being zeroed. It was actually the test for >>zero returning improper values due to being interrupted by a signal. >> >>I made a fix last night that allowed me to run this for 2500+ >>iterations. Of course, I have managed to do that before without error, >>so that doesn't mean much, I guess. Backing the change out resulted in >>a 'virtual memory exhausted' error in less than a hundred iterations, >>however. Odd that I can duplicate it so readily now. I think my >>computer was previously trying to shield me from the pain of debugging >>this problem. >> >>There is a new snapshot up now with my fix in it. Please try it. > >Sigh. Literally two minutes after sending this email, the "make -j" >test that I was running at home errored out with a different error. > >Back to the drawing board...
Hmm. I can't duplicate the failure I saw so maybe it would still be instructive to see how the current snapshot works for others. Please send test results here. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
