On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jason Tishler wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, rebasing apparently breaks zsh:
> > >
> > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00415.html
> >
> > As the zsh maintainer, I'm still waiting for the rebase and gcc
> > maintainers to make a ruling on just where the problem is. See:
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00573.html
>
> FWIW, I just tried the above with Microsoft's rebase and observed the
> same behavior. Note this is not a "ruling" just another data point.
Well, considering what the root problem is, I wouldn't expect MS's rebase
to work any better than the cygwin version. However, I would like to see
some cooperation on how to resolve it. This problem is not specific to
zsh. It has more to do with how exported symbols are treated/managed.
I'd almost propose that rebase change such symbols' value, being rebase
is the one changing the image base of the dll in the first place.
However, I would really like to understand why this symbol exists and if
there is some way to eliminate it and use the dll's real image base
instead.
> Jason
--
Peter A. Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
