On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:32:32PM -0000, Hughes, Bill wrote: >>Sent: 20 February 2004 13:42 From: Christopher Faylor >> >>I suppose that theory will be corroborated soon as the complaints flood >>into this mailing list. Or not. >> >>FWIW, WFM. > >I didn't parse this last correctly as standard acronyms and thought cgf >was having an even worse day than usual and had escalated WJM to the >next level... Have a nice weekend,
If I am understanding your misinterpretation correctly you can rest assured that I try hard to avoid the use of or implication of profanity in my messages although I'm sure an occasional RT?M has slipped by. However, that said, for the longest time, I habitually read WFM as exactly what I think you think it means. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
