At 09:42 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote: >On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 09:38:33PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote: >> At 09:10 PM 2/5/2004, Edward S. Peschko you wrote: >> >hey, >> > >> >I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to >> >ldd. >> > >> >If so, why isn't it called ldd? >> > >> >If not, what's the equivalent? >> > >> >I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in >> > >> >http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html >> > >> >but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken. >> >> >> Try: >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html >> >> You have a typo in the URL above. >> > >well, I was there - I'm referring to the link *inside* the message.
Of course. My apologies. >It points to some site which no longer exists. Quite true. >In any case, why isn't ldd bundled with binutils? Sorry, I'm not equipped to answer that. >Is it just because >ldd is implemented on top of objdump? Certainly not. Cygwin's binutils has 'objdump'. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
