On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote: > Brian Ford wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 15 January 2004 17:50 > > To: Dave Korn > > Cc: cygwin[snip] > > Subject: RE: CVS b0rked? > > I think we would all prefer that even the cygwin list address be trivially concealed.
> > Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body > > of messages. > > They are food for spam harvesters. I imagine this was just > > an oversight as I think I have seen you remove them before? > > > Oops, yes indeed. Sorry. It happened because I replied to the copy you > sent me directly instead of to the copy which came via the listserv with the > redacted headers. So I quoted an addy, but then again you've been Cc'ing > posters as well as sending to the list. Chalk us up one minor breach of > list etiquette each! > Have you seen this? http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00641.html I must admit that with that option available, I'm too lazy to check or remember who is on the list and who is not. I just take the default reply my mailer (pine) presents to me. I think that is as much as anyone can reasonably ask. > > You could try to debug it :). > > Ya never know, I might just do that. Is it worth rebuilding with > --enable-debugging at configure time ? I dunno how much worthwhile that > will actually give me.... > IIRC, --enable-debugging just adds more verbose logging (primarily strace) and enables CYGWIN_DEBUG functionality. So, it is probably not worth it. Just debug with the version you've got. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
