> With carrier pigeon 1.0, the beak is so small you have to > dis-assemble/re-assemble the IP packets. > > Carrier pigeon 2.0 has a bigger beak and can hold a full packet. > > Unfortunately the evolutionary process is goin slow. Maybe within a > couple of millenium. > > Have you thought about using IP-over-turkey instead? > > It is slower and not very sexy, but with the bigger beak, you can get > better bandwidth. > > Greg
We've been using IP-over-pelican. No problems with packet size, excellent bandwidth, and it's eliminated my need for a weekly trip to the local sushi bar. -Samrobb -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
