On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:58:02PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>Sorry but it's unlikely. As I said, there is already a start of an >>implementation for this which I am unlikely to want to throw out. >Ok. > >>I expect to have a working fifo implementation in a couple of releases. >How much of time could it take?
It would probably take me a couple of days once I'm out from under the mountain of work that I'm currently experiencing. >Can I do something to decrease this delay? Cause I want to have newest >cygwin version and Unix FIFO support already. This is one of those cases where there is really no good solution for you. I don't see this happening soon and I really don't have the time to try to shepard you, or anyone, through the current fifo code so that I can fill you in on the way I want to see this done. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
