On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:37:36PM +0100, Philippe Torche wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>The subject says it all. >> >>I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas. > >I've tested it (CVS version 12:35 GMT + 1) on our 4 Xeon on W2003S and >unfortunately my previous test case (run_t.sh and t.sh) always fails.
Let me be extremely clear about this again: I don't have a 4 Xeon processor running W2003S. I will not be able to test this and I, frankly, don't care much about this corner case -- especially if it is not a regression from previous releases. So, if you were just reporting this as a data point, then thanks. If you are expecting me to do something about it, then, you will, unfortunately, be disappointed. >The test suite runs soon happily (except now 3 cases) with my Athlon on >WinXP, and I'm preparing to run it tomorrow on our 4 Xeon. I think I will have to give a gold star to the person who figures out why those three cases are "failing". It really isn't that hard. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
