This is a confusing and contradictory jumble. I suggest you try again with more detail.
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Jaroslaw Pawlak wrote: > Hello! the problem is i'm not using all gcc but only ld and ld does not > understands the -mno-cygwin switch. > It doesn't need to. If you are only using ld, then just don't link with cygwin1.dll or any DLL's that depend on it. That is what the -mno-cygwin switch would do. > Also i have to mix this cygwin dll with my VC program so this isn't > good solution for me. If you say that this option -mno-cygwin would > help then please tell me something more about gcc. > So, you must be using Cygwin's gcc in regular Cygwin mode, and -mno-cygwin would not be an option. In that case, I think you are out of luck. I have "heard" there are complex work arounds for this, but they are not 100% successful. I don't know what they are, so plan to spend a lot of time googling, head bashing, and examining your "inner self" if you take this route. :) > I have changed ld becouse it had this 0 bit reloc bug, but when i > tried to make my dll with gcc (i already got the *.obj so i used gcc olny > for its -mno-cygwin switch) then i run into 0 bit reloc again. > Lobby the Cygwin binutils maintainer for an update, or make sure you have replaced the ld gcc is using. Look at the output of "gcc --verbose" to see which one that is. > How to recompile the gcc alone? > You shouldn't need to if you do the above. > becouse binutils after compilation didn't left any gcc.exe. > It wouldn't. gcc and binutils are separate software packages. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
