Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Thanks for the patch. I'm sorry but it's not quite clear to me what > the second part of the patch is doing? Could you give a short explanation > why it returns at that point if sawSomething is 0?
As the line is traversed, sawSomething gets 0 at every comma and 1 at every other non-space. At the point you mention, the end of the line has been reached and the remainder of the function records the address since the last comma. But if sawSomething==0 (i.e., the comma ended the line) that address would be ""; including that as a recipient has undesired consequences, so the patch causes a return instead. > Oh, btw., Chris is right. It would be nice if you could adhere to > the formatting rules of the surrounding source. Thank you both for alerting me to this, I will pay more attention to it in the future. > Are you interested in maintaining that new version? It seems to > address the multiple recipient problem already, AFAICT. It would > probably just need a Makefile tweak and the small patch from Enoch Wu, > which allows to send to a server listening on other ports than 25. I would be happy to, but be aware that it will almost certainly be a couple of weeks before I look at it---so if anyone else wants at it, I encourage them. Robert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
