On Sat, 2003-11-22 at 21:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > However, CYG_MAX_PATH is simply decoupling the win32 ANSI path limit > > from our internal path limit. If and when we don't have an effective > > internal limit anymore, sure it can go. > > Yup, that's what I meant. It doesn't hurt to check the occurences > of CYG_MAX_PATH now, if there isn't a simple way to get around without > it. Other than that, I think the right limit is 32K as I already wrote > in my first reply (see above), not something less than that. Using > some arbitrary number like 4K only results in headaches at a point > where you had never expected it. The difference to Linux is, that 4K > is the real limit on Linux, while our limit is 32K.
Ok. Well, once we have the bugs ironed out, lets bump PATH_MAX to 32K, and let the recompilation begin :}. I'll probably put a few test binaries together in a setup.exe repository - ash, bash, tar, gzip as a minimum for folk to play with, when the patch gets closer to full completion. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part