Doru Carastan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In reply to: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg00478.html
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It is normal to see "touch foo.exe; cp foo bar" fail. You just created
> foo.exe, which is definitely not foo. Check with "ls -l".
Yes, I'm aware that foo.exe is not foo, but fileutils-4.1-1 contained
code which special-cased this situation, IMO very usefully. What I
would like to see is a ChangeLog entry or CVS log message or something
that corresponds to and explains the removal of that code.
> The current versions of autoconf and automake define and use
> EXEEXT=.exe. Check your Makefile.am or Makefile.in files and add
> $(EXEEXT) to all commands that involve executables.
The build system in question is not based on autoconf/automake.
- Nathan
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
