zzapper wrote: > What I really want to know is why there are so few acronyms in WTF, > does anyone have bigger datafiles??
Because as distributed, it was not intended to be a universal acronym dictionary (which could run to millions of acronyms). WTF has generally been used to expand acronyms for phrases used in typical mailing list/newsgroup settings (e.g. IMO, etc.) But hey, if someone has the energy to create *and maintain* a univeral acronym library, go for it! -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
