Alex wrote:
> "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Alex wrote: >> >> > An algorithm which computes very long Fibonacci numbers >> > >> > >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bnni5p%2412i47o%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de >> > was used as a performance testsuite >> > to compare speed of the code produced by various compilers. >> >> > >> |------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> > | Digital Mars C/C++ Compiler, STLport 4.5.3 >> > >> |------------------------------------------------------------------------| >> > | Version 8.35n | - | 0.20 : 0.16 | 0.84 : 0.80 | 3.82 : 3.74 | >> > >> |========================================================================| >> >> >> Do you think to use STLport with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler would >> increase perfomance? >> > [snip] > What is the way to test that? > In other words, is there STLporting with the Cygwin/MinGW compiler? I posted a Makefile to build a Cygwin version of STLport with DLL's and static archives: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-06/msg00790.html If it shows up that using STLport instead of libstdc++ templates increases the speed of the code running, maybe someone volunteers to maintain an STLport package for Cygwin? Gerrit -- =^..^= http://nyckelpiga.de/donate.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
