What happened to that automatic dependency checking, that was talked about a few months ago ?
And what about "test versions should not appear for selection if Exp is not choosen" ? I quote Larry Hall : Setup offers test versions to you even when you don't specify "Exp". But it's always done this. It's just more noticeable now. It will go away in a few weeks when 1.5.x becomes "Curr". > ---------- > From: Igor Pechtchanski[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 20. oktober 2003 16:38 > To: David Balazic > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: setup.exe what versions ? > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, David Balazic wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I already have cygwin installed and want to install gcc ( I do not have > > it currently installed ). > > > > I run setup.exe, and have two options for gcc , versions 3.3.1-2 and > 3.2-3. > > > > Now I had some problems last time with some experimental package > > versions that are not compatible to the rest and therefore do not work > > at all. > > > > So my question is, which gcc version is non-experimental ? > > The older version ? > > I there some simple rule ? > > > > Thanks in advance ! > > David > > The simplest thing you can do is look at the announcements for each > version and see whether they mention anything special (like requiring > Cygwin 1.5.*). The announcements are in the cygwin-announce archives (at, > for example, <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/>). HTH, > Igor > -- > http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ > |\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D. > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow! > > "I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route > to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
