At 12:50 PM 10/15/2003, Micha Nelissen you wrote: >Larry Hall wrote: > >>At 11:45 AM 10/15/2003, Corinna Vinschen you wrote: >> >>>On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:31:50AM -0400, Larry Hall wrote: >>> >>>>Actually, when we say please attach the cygcheck output, we want it *attached*, >>>>not enclosed. We also prefer 'cygcheck -srv'. >>> >>>Larry, it *is* attached. >> >>Not for me and not in the archives. It's included, not attached. Or am I missing >>something? Also, the output is from 'cygcheck -s', though that >>observation is somewhat pedantic. > >Maybe the archives don't support attachments. It surely is attached:
OK, I'll take your word for it. However, the archives does support attachments (see <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg00918.html> for example.) -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
