Yes, indeed! I get it working and thank you so much! That's what I used to do when program c++ under windows, but seems not the right way for UNIX. I will send email to list after this one :-)
Kevin > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Kai Xu (Kevin)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: undefined reference to 'class::function' error > > > > Kevin, > > > > Please don't Cc: me, I read the list (I set the Reply-To: for a reason). > > More below. > > > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Kai Xu (Kevin) wrote: > > > > > As I am not good at c++, I am not sure what you mean by "link the file > that > > > defines this function into the resulting executable". I just include the > .h > > > file that defines the function in the main .cpp file. The compile > command I > > > used is: > > > > > > g++ sp.cpp (the main cpp file) > > > > > > I guess there could be some problem here. > > > > > > Kevin > > > > Aha, so you aren't linking the file in. This is a general C/C++ question, > > not Cygwin specific, and thus off-topic for this list. For more details, > > read up on "separate compilation" and "multiple source files" in any C/C++ > > book. For a short term solution, simply add the cpp file that defines the > > missing function to the compile command, but if you need further help on > > similar issues, please try a C/C++ user support list/newsgroup or read > > an intro to programming book. > > Igor > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
