On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 08:15:56PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote: >I see. You only appeared to invite investigation. This gcc >announcement page that I referenced in my first email said nothing >about gcj or java problems. http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html I >did substantial searching, downloading and recompiling. But all you >can do is to write it off with a flip comment. > >These kinds of responses are very discouraging to people who want to >help.
You seemed to be puzzled that java wasn't working. I pointed to the announcement that indicated the state of java. If you only read the latest announcement which indicated that it was a "very minor refresh" then you wouldn't have seen the above message. However, the "very minor refresh" phrase could have also triggered a "Hmm. I wonder what this is a minor refresh of" type of inquiry. I point these kind of things out so that, in the future, if you are researching problems like this, you will know where to search. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
