On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Volker Zell writes:
>
> > libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.la
> > libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.la
> > libguilereadline-v-12.la
> >
> > whereas they should be instead under /usr/lib (in the package
> > guild-devel-1.6.4-12) I think.
>
> No, this is correct. These are dlopened and need to be in PATH. Try:
>
> guile -c '(use-modules (srfi srfi-4) (srfi srfi-13) (srfi srfi-14))'
>
> Jan.
Aren't the names a bit misleading, then? The .la files are supposed to be
libtool library files, i.e., plain text. If they are dlopened, they
should be named .dll, right? Or am I missing something?
It's ok to keep dlls in one directory (or even package), and import libs
(.la) in another (as long as the .la files reflect this fact). In fact,
since there's a guile-devel package, shouldn't the libtool import libs
belong there?
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster." -- Patrick Naughton
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
