On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 11:33:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 01:09:08AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >>[snip]
Just another data point: from the URL posted, this wasn't a test of the gcc that I released. This was a gcc built from a CVS branch (although the subject and the body of the message do seem to be at odds, it seems clear that this isn't my release). Since it was built from CVS, it is not inconceivable that someone who mastered that intricate feat would want to take over maintenance. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
