On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:18:01PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:30:08AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> >>>>I don't mean to speak for Chuck but, after some discussion, it's >>>>intended to be a separate package. The intent was to not put a zlib >>>>directory in winsup, which would be the case with mingw-runtime. Ditto >>>>for the gcc sources. >>> >>>So basically this means that everyone wanting to compile Cygwin from >>>CVS or source tarball will have to install this package, right? >> >>If they want this functionality, yes. > >Yes. Currently, the package is in the 'Mingw' group (for lack of >anything better).
Tsk, tsk. I didn't notice that you invented a new category. I don't see any reason why this should just be in Libs. It's a mingw library but, since we don't make the Mingw distinction for anything else, I don't know why zlib should be different. The description should be adequate, IMO. Note that cygcheck will still compile and link without this libarary. You'll get a warning and the resultant program won't be able to access the package files. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/