Hello,

the output of "which ar" under cygwin is:
  ar is /usr/bin/ar
  ar is /bin/ar
... both are cygwin directories.

The idea with "TMPDIR=. ar cq libdh.a a.o b.o" of Igor points in the right direction 
but it did not work ...
maybe "rename" is not looking for the environment variable "TMPDIR".
I still get the error message "ar: libdh.a: rename: Cross-device link" and the 
resulting library
is empty. But as a workaround I changed the makefiles to create the library in "/tmp" 
and then I
moved the result to ".":
  ar cq /tmp/libdh.a a.o b.o
  mv /tmp/libdh.a libdh.
... this is ugly but it works.

Now I found out that also the program "ranlib.exe" has this renaming problem. I think 
that the "rename" command
of libc is broken or "Services for Unix from Microsoft" is buggy. Maybe it is more 
successful to make the rename
command in "libc" more robust than waiting for a bugfix from Microsoft ...

Thanks for your ideas and help
Daniel




                                                                                       
                                                                   
                                                                                       
                                                                   
                                                          To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]      
                                                                   
                                                          cc:   (bcc: Daniel 
Hempel/HBR/RESEARCH/PHILIPS)                                                 
                                                          Subject:    Re: bug in "ar" 
when creating libraries on cross linked filesystems                 
                                                                                       
                                                                   
               Ronald Landheer-Cieslak                    Classification:              
                                                                   
               <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                      
                                                      
               net>                                                                    
                                                                   
                                                                                       
                                                                   
               Sent by:                                                                
                                                                   
               [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                       
                                                             
                                                                                       
                                                                   
               05.09.2003 16:41                                                        
                                                                   
               Please respond to cygwin                                                
                                                                   
                                                                                       
                                                                   
                                                                                       
                                                                   




I can't reproduce the problem and don't see anything out of the ordinary in
your cygcheck output.
Could you do a
$ which ar
and see if you're really working with Cygwin's ar?

(I've just read Igor's reply - interesting hunch, but I'd have expected to
be able to reproduce the problem..)

rlc






--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

Reply via email to