On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:27:49AM -0400, Richard Campbell wrote: >cgf wrote: >>Haven't I already vetoed this once? > >Have you? I searched the cygwin, cygwin-xfree, and cygwin-apps mailing >list archives for ddd, read all messages from you, back 2 years on the >cygwin list and for all time on the other two, and I see no veto from >you for ddd. > >Where should I have looked?
Nowhere else. I thought I'd vetoed this previously. I guess I hadn't. I'm on the fence on this one. I am not very interested in accepting any package which could conceivably increase my own packaging burdens, i.e., if a problem in ddd (or cgdb) requires a change to gdb then I don't want to have to worry about that. -- Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email. Special for spam email harvesters: send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
