Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > "The silence is deafening". Apparently there aren't too many folks using > > telnet with > > xinetd ( I know, I know, SSH is what everyone's doing ). Anyhow, I do have > > a fairly important > > need for this combo, and the problem outlined below is a significant one > > for me. Before I > > do anything else - I would *really* like to know at least, if anyone else > > gets the same behavior. > > That would at least establish that I'm dealing with a legitimate bug rather > > than a setup > > or configuration issue. Just a "me too" - or "works for me" would be MUCH > > appreciated. > > You could try attaching to the xinetd (and inetd) process with strace to see > if there's a noticable difference somewhere.
Hmmm... What I meant to say is attach *to* the telnetd processes not the *inetd processes. -- Elfyn -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
