On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:53:50PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: >On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:14:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I assume that you must not have correctly replaced your copy of >> /lib/libc.a: >> >> % ls -l libc.a >> ls -l libc.a >> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root cgf 741756 Aug 5 23:29 libc.a >> % sum libc.a >> 31407 725 >> >> cgf >$ ls -l libc.a >-rw-r--r-- 1 RLandhee Aucun 741756 Aug 6 05:29 libc.a >$ sum libc.a >31407 725 > >sorry, but it looks to me like it's the right one.. >(timezone accounts for the difference in file date, I guess) >I've put the results of the STC here if you want to check them out: >eb97528e1c0f39b29e79e6a4998468ab *stc.tar.bz2 >http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/stc.tar.bz2 > >cygcheck output is here: >15b2c5971ad44d991496561272be6c0c *cygcheck.out >http://blytkerchan.chez.tiscali.fr/cygcheck.out
Looking at the objdump from your test1.exe, it sure seems like you're using an older version of libc.a. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
