On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:37:53PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote: >Le lun 04 ao? 2003 20:05:45 GMT, Nicholas Wourms a tapot? sur son clavier : >>That being said, My suggestion to Samuel would be to investigate the >>FreeBSD cvs repo to see if they have implimented ftw() in their libc, >>since they have a more "free" license and aren't GPL-infected. > >It seems to be still worked on, and not available in their cvs :/
What is with the selective reading style in this thread? I saw that a referenced LGPL license is unacceptable for cygwin. Gerrit responds with a pointer to a BSD licensed version. Asks if it is acceptable. I say probably but you'd have to ask the newlib mailing list. Nicholas responds eight hours after this interchange. He opines that I probably don't know about the Red Hat employees who run the glibc project and offers that somebody should find a BSD licensed version of ftw. Now, a day later, we find that Gerrit's email has again been ignored and the Wourms plan is unworkable. Odd. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
