> Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:52:36AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > >>Not only that, but this appears to go even further. By essentially > >>"compiling" all these GNU utilities into one executable, there's a > >>violation of the GPL to the extent that the code used to do that does > >>not appear to be "Open Source". Double Whammy here. > >> > >>And by the way - I AM a lawyer. (Member of the Michigan Bar > >>Association in Good Standing). > >> > >> > > > >I noticed that but i was wondering if these were actually cygwin tools. > >Has anyone verified that?
They're *the* cygwin tools. I downloaded last week and it link to the source does not appear anywhere (except reference to the cygwin web site which I don't seem to find today.) There's no acknowledgement from cygwin whatsoever. Hmmm...a really flagrant violation of the GPL. Best Regards, Carlo ------ Carlo Florendo Astra Philippines Inc. URL: http://www.hq.astra.ph/resources/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
